Humanistic formation in Higher
Education. A comparative study
Formación
humanista en Educación Superior. Un estudio comparativo
Edgar Gómez Bonilla
Master in Education, Benemérita Universidad
Autónoma de Puebla,
Puebla. gbonillaedgar@yahoo.com.mx, Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-8584
...........................................
_files/image001.png)
SUMMAR
This research assesses
the students' perspective on how they assume the humanistic formation in their
education. The quantitative research with cross-sectional design and
descriptive scope, indicates in the findings that
university students know how important it is to have mastery of technical
skills to achieve a favorable job performance, which is strengthened by
assuming the values of responsibility, solidarity, commitment and collaboration
from their professional practice to project the development and progress of
humanity. The comparative analysis of the Bachelor's degree programs in Public
Administration and Management for Development, Civil Engineering, Nursing and
History indicates that 65% of the students accept the influence that the
international context has on Higher Education (HE), which is why they must opt
for a technical-specialized education and also place the importance of assuming
values that promote humanist principles as a counterweight to the
homogenization that Globalization has tried to impose.
Key words:
Higher
education, humanistic education, globalization, promotion of values.
RESUMEN
La presente
investigación valora la perspectiva de los estudiantes sobre como asumen la
formación humanista en su educación. La investigación cuantitativa con diseño
transversal y alcance descriptivo, indica en los hallazgos que los
universitarios saben lo importante que es contar con el dominio de las
habilidades técnicas para lograr un desempeño laboral favorable, que se
fortalece al asumir los valores de la responsabilidad, la solidaridad, el
compromiso y la colaboración desde su práctica profesional para proyectar el
desarrollo y progreso de la humanidad. El análisis comparativo de los programas
de Licenciatura en Administración Pública y Gestión para el Desarrollo,
Ingeniería Civil, Enfermería e Historia, indican que el 65% de los estudiantes
aceptan la influencia que tiene el contexto internacional en la Educación
Superior (ES), por lo que deben optar por una educación técnica-especializada y
también ubican la importancia de asumir los valores que promuevan los
principios humanistas como contrapeso a la homogeneización que ha pretendido
imponer la Globalización.
Palabras clave: Educación Superior,
formación humanista, globalización, promoción de valores.
Introduction
One
of the phenomena inscribed in contemporary societies is Globalization, which
has transformed the world by introducing human beings into a homogeneous
scenario that favors its apparent growth and disguised progress. The worldwide
phenomenon has been referenced as the means to provide answers to the
innumerable problems afflicting society, although such answers are approached
from discourses that are generated from the economic perspective, leaving
education, culture, ideology, beliefs, politics and society in second
place.
HE
in the last 30 years has been influenced by economic activity derived from
aspects such as the opening of markets, regional integration, modernization of
production processes, technology and media management; as well as, the highly
consumerist societies, which are justified in the value of democracy promoting
in individuals the acceptance of principles based on competitiveness, quality,
efficiency, effectiveness, productivity and profitability, putting aside the
sense of education which is to offer the learner something more than
theoretical content, or the learning of techniques; this has to be complemented
with the acquisition of the global vision proper of the training and with an
attitude of commitment to the social and political world to which the learner
belongs (Vargas, 2010, p. 154).
It
is thought that economic prosperity is the result of participating in regional
integration processes, forgetting the particularities of a nation that is
represented in the diversity of languages, behaviors, cultural goods and habits
that should ensure the continuation of coexistence and interactive relations in
society (García, 2009, p. 26). Individualities, identities, nationalisms,
reason and particularities cease to be relevant if it is understood that the
globalizing discourse is interested in promoting homogeneous societies instead
of heterogeneous ones that guarantee world development; therefore, economic
integration should be projected as a coordinated decision to face adverse
situations as a key challenge for the countries of Latin America and the
Caribbean (LAC), and the creation of common regional agendas represents an
opportunity to promote cooperation (SELA, 2024, p. 5). The influence of
Globalization in the international context in HE is growing due to the labor
market, and from this perspective, it is necessary to count on cheap and
qualified labor, which has generated that humanity is carried away by technical
knowledge and automaton work, which ends up eliminating the norms of coexistence
and interaction in its relationship with others, assuming a utilitarian
perspective that should grant economic solvency, thus forgetting the humanistic
essence of individuals (Berumen, 2001, p. 141).
It
is important to reorient the training of future professionals from the
university campuses so that their performance evidences a humanistic
participation and retakes in their actions the essential values of the person,
if in the short term we aspire to survive as a species, so it is here where HE
must emerge to propose alternatives to ensure the integral development of
society, understanding that humanistic education deals with the moral spaces of
individuals, to provide ground for independence and the use of dialogue in all
communication processes. At the same time, the educational act is constituted
as the foundation of elements and policies that, by sustaining humanism as a
base, may be more adequate and more responsible. Both the design, innovation,
as well as the implementation of plans and programs in humanistic education,
manage to establish with capacity for dialogue and self-knowledge, the
projection of subjects with moral quality, to achieve the authentic integral
formation (Sesento, 2021, p. 72).
Higher education and
university education benchmarks in the international context
The
search for the strengthening of Higher Education Institutions (HEI) has been a
task of the federal government since the 1960's in the 20th century, so that it
has had a relevant participation in their development in terms of financing . With this, Mexico's educational behavior in the
1990s can be understood, which, channeled by the state, influenced the trends
and results presented by public universities financed with federal funds, by
seeking a quality education based on the formation of students, with
individualistic capacities to adapt to the challenges posed by the productive
and working environments, as opposed to the formation that should be granted
from the universities to reaffirm the commitment of future professionals to
their society, avoiding in them the state of individualism and indifference
(Torres and Zanatta, 2022, p. 2).
Currently,
the challenge is to improve the quality of education and promote the
strengthening of academic staff, students and graduates, because they determine
the reality of how study plans and programs should be designed, by creating
infrastructure and having the equipment that provides a timely organization of
school administration, the relevant point with which the Public University is
characterized is to respond to the needs that societies pose in international,
national and state contexts. HE policies point out the need to train students
who, upon graduation, understand current social problems and act as agents of
transformation by having a series of skills and abilities to formulate
solutions and solve key situations that contribute to progress.
Conceptual aspects in the
promotion of values as a humanistic university education.
The
promotion of values in humanity is an important aspect to be addressed due to
the series of changes that are taking place, societies manifest scopes, but
also demands that make their existence complex in the various areas that arise
from everyday life, where pragmatic, utilitarian and materialistic behaviors
seem to be the reason to act as individuals. At present, the promotion of
values is a defensive response to the dehumanized culture, where it is
necessary that societies retake the basic principles of humanistic attitudes,
represented by the sense given to actions, whose orientation seeks the good of
the person himself and the community, reflecting on the transcendence of the
human being, because "the inclusion of values in educational practice
becomes relevant when considering them as necessary principles in the social
interactions of individuals and groups, and also because they contribute to
create environments of respect in the different social contexts"
(Washburn, Chaves, Valverde-Hernández and Páez, 2022, p. 14).
The
approaches presented in the study of values are novel, their definitions
propose a series of changes for world society and, in view of this, it has been decided to reorient their conceptualization
towards principles that give meaning to the actions that we as individuals
manifest on a daily basis. In Western culture, values have reached a stage
where the contradictions on which they are based, added to the material world
in which we live, have led them to be preached as universal theoretical
premises that in reality are mentioned, but in practice are not understood, as
is currently the case with the principles of justice, equity, solidarity,
equality, tolerance, respect, among others, and that if not promoted will
result in consequences that will often be subject to negative sanctions by the
immediate social environment.
In
the third decade of the 21st century, values contradict each other, because one
thing is what is said and another is what is done, that is to say that in
practice different connotations are manifested, causing in society, confusion,
conflicts and fear about the future that awaits us in the face of the
materialistic dynamics that is gaining ground every day. Values education is
understood as "the set of principles related to attitudes and norms that
establish an alignment between the values preached and those practiced,
avoiding confusion between saying what is really done or really doing what is
said" (Coll, 1998, p. 63).
The
teaching of values has been presented in two scenarios: transmission and
promotion. Transmission, with some time of
application, has simply led to the conception and description of values; the
second, of recent creation, emerges as an alternative that delimits the bases
to act in a way that ensures the preservation of the world and social development
based on the practice of man's essential values.
Calzada
(1998) defines values as the moral formation of young people based on the
transmission of values for the implementation of practices for the benefit of
society; this task is a responsibility that has been assigned to school
institutions since the birth of modern educational systems (p. 65). For Garza
(2000), the transmission of values are a set of "intangible, and timeless
entities that are expressed through human actions, where the important thing is
to contextualize situations and try to explain them or describe events, as
necessary tasks to evaluate the meaning of actions" (p. 17). The position
of "transmission of values" remains at the level of the imaginary and
sentimental, therefore, the education of feelings is important, however, it is
necessary that reason prevails in the interaction of the individual to convince
the other, in order to seek a human and social complementarity.
For
his part, Berumen (2001) refers to the promotion of
values as: "that phase that is related to the knowledge and will
capacities of individuals, where the axis of action is man, the person, because
every existing human being is a person" (p. 129). It is about people in
the international context not staying in the formation or presentation of
something, but in ensuring a professional practice based on valid reasoning,
because the training that the student should receive through his insertion in
the higher educational context should favor personal development, through the
expansion of intellectual, social, cultural, practical horizons, among others
inherent to the human being who feels, thinks, acts and does; but above all,
who acts as a being with ethics (Dimas, 2017, p. 244).
Following
the postulates of Camps (1993), Coll (1998) and Berumen (2001) for the case of undergraduate students, an
alternative for improvement is to go beyond the transmission of values by
opting for their promotion. It is necessary to rethink the teaching of values
so that from their impulse, individuals and especially university students
relate the principles preached with those practiced, avoiding the separation in
both planes. The promotion of values
should allow individuals to anticipate the facts through the sense they give to
their actions, because if they continue in the transmission phase, they will
continue in the line of communication of values from their conception and
preaching without relating them and even less applying them. The aim is to
progress from values with ethical sense where skepticism is abandoned, looking
for ways to facilitate social coexistence, thinking in
more hopeful positions for our immediate future. The intention is to activate
humanistic attitudes where the development of the spirit, the search for health
and economic welfare, all of which are based on social responsibility.
Materials and methods
The research assesses
the effects of the globalizing context in HE, as well
as the limitations it generates in the humanistic formation of university
students, the purpose is to analyze a series of strategies that allow the
promotion of a humanistic attitude with an interdisciplinary perspective in
undergraduate students.
Design
The methodology
carried out in this research is based on the quantitative approach (McMillan
and Schumacher, 2005), because it measures the appreciation of the influence of
the globalizing context that affects the professional training of university
students, which has an impact on the attitudes and values they assume to
participate in the social context. The
research has a non-experimental cross-sectional design, because data are
collected at a specific time that allows a comparative study among four
undergraduate programs. The research is descriptive because it identifies the
characteristics and profiles of university students with respect to the
humanistic training obtained for their future performance as professionals in
the labor market. The purpose is to identify the influence of the globalizing
context on university students in order to understand why there is an
orientation towards individuality and materiality instead of assuming a
humanistic attitude as a reasonable alternative.
Spatiality
International
educational trends and their influence on undergraduate students are studied in
the scenario of the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), based on four academic programs
located in the Faculties of Administration, Nursing, Philosophy and Letters and
Civil Engineering. BUAP is one of the public universities that at regional and
national level has achieved growth parameters based on the policies it has
promoted in education, for example the quality of the programs is evidenced by
the terminal efficiency rates, as well as external evaluations conducted by the
Interinstitutional Committees for the Evaluation of Higher Education (CIEES),
the Council for the Accreditation of Higher Education (COPAES), and the
National Council for Humanities, Science and Technology (CONAHCyT).
In BUAP, 88 years
after its creation (1937), the educational offer of bachelor's degrees in
face-to-face mode is 93 programs, which are divided into four areas of
knowledge: Economic-administrative, Engineering and Exact Sciences, Natural and
Health Sciences, Social Sciences and Humanities (BUAP, 2024). In the
economic-administrative area, there are five academic units: Administration,
Public Accounting, Economics, Communication Sciences and Law, which offer 18
degree programs; for the purposes of the study, the
Bachelor's Degree in Public Administration and Management for Development was
chosen.
In Natural and Health
Sciences, there are seven academic units: Agricultural and Livestock Sciences,
Biological Sciences, Nursing, Stomatology, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, offering 18 programs, choosing the Bachelor's
Degree in Nursing. In the case of Engineering and Exact Sciences, seven units
are presented: Architecture, Computer Sciences, Electronics Sciences, Chemical
Sciences, Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Physical Mathematics, which offer 33 programs, the
Bachelor's Degree in Civil Engineering was selected.
Finally, in the area
of Social Sciences and Humanities, there are seven academic units: Plastic and
Audiovisual Arts, Arts, Political and Social Sciences, Physical Culture,
Philosophy and Letters, Languages, Psychology, offering 24 programs, the area
was represented by the Bachelor's Degree in History (BUAP, 2024).
Timeliness
The timeframe of the
research study was Fall 2024, with the 2022 (fourth semester) and 2023 (sixth
semester) generations of students in the Minerva Model curriculum who studied
the General University Training Area with the subjects Human and Social
Formation and Development of Complex Thinking Skills.
Subjects and study sample
The study universe was
made up of the group of undergraduate students and the sample is organized
according to the four areas of knowledge that represent the BUAP's Higher
Education Division (DES) (see Table 1)
Table 1.
Universe and sample of
students.
|
Higher
Education Division |
Program |
Student population |
Sample of students |
|
Economic-administrative |
Public Administration and
Development Management |
581 |
59 |
|
Engineering and Exact Sciences |
Civil Engineering |
1487 |
148 |
|
Natural and Health Sciences |
Nursing |
1039 |
103 |
|
Social Sciences and Humanities |
History |
351 |
36 |
|
T O T A L |
3458 |
346 |
|
Source:
BUAP (2024). Anuario del Tercer Informe de Labores. Rectory.
The following academic
programs were chosen: Public Administration and Management for Development,
Civil Engineering, Nursing and History, and their students were the subjects
who answered the research instrument in the form of a questionnaire. As for the
student sample, we worked with 346 subjects who represent 10% of the 3,458
students enrolled in the aforementioned degree programs (see Table 1).
According to their data, the student sample ranged in age from 18 to 26 years
old (see Table 2). The ages most frequently displayed in the questionnaires
were, in first place, 20 years of age with 75 mentions for the four academic
programs, followed by 22 years of age with 70 mentions. The least
representative ages were 25 and 26 years, which were presented in the Nursing
and History degree programs, and although the frequency was not numerous, the
data indicate that for this type of program the study ages are broader, that
is, older populations in comparison with the other programs (see Table 2).
Table 2.
Average age of the sample of
students.
|
Program |
Administration Public |
Civil Engineering |
Nursing |
History |
|
Age |
f |
f |
f |
f |
|
18 |
9 |
15 |
8 |
0 |
|
19 |
7 |
12 |
20 |
11 |
|
20 |
15 |
34 |
22 |
4 |
|
21 |
9 |
23 |
16 |
0 |
|
22 |
13 |
31 |
20 |
6 |
|
23 |
4 |
18 |
10 |
5 |
|
24 |
2 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
|
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
26 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
4 |
|
Total |
59 |
148 |
103 |
36 |
|
Average |
20.5 |
21.12 |
20.81 |
21.78 |
The demographic data
of the sample allow visualizing a student group with an average age of 21.05
years, so it can be stated that the population currently being formed in the
university classrooms is young, that is the trend that is presented in the
first four semesters. As for the gender
of the group of students, the situation does not differ from that prevailing in
the other academic units of the university, where the school population
presents higher figures for the male than the female gender. In the case of the
sample of the 346 students surveyed, 145 are female and 201 are male,
presenting a percentage of 42% and 58% respectively (see Table 3).
Table 3.
Gender of the sample
student population by academic program.
|
Program |
Public Administration |
Civil Engineering |
Nursing |
History |
Total |
|||||
|
Genre |
f |
% |
f |
% |
f |
% |
f |
% |
f |
% |
|
Female |
31 |
51 |
36 |
25 |
68 |
66 |
10 |
23 |
145 |
42 |
|
Male |
28 |
49 |
112 |
75 |
35 |
34 |
26 |
77 |
201 |
58 |
|
Total |
59 |
100 |
148 |
100 |
103 |
100 |
36 |
100 |
346 |
100 |
The
table shows a gender balance in the Public Administration degree, but not in
Civil Engineering (75%) and History (77%), where the tendency is towards men,
while Nursing (665) is for women.
Instrument
The
instrument in the form of a questionnaire was addressed to the group of
students and its elaboration was the result of a literature search and review,
which led to the establishment of measurement and validation criteria required
by quantitative studies. Four study variables are approached for the analysis
of the influence of the globalizing context in the humanistic formation of
future university professionals represented in: 1. Attitudes that teachers
should demonstrate in the classroom; 2. Skills that HE students should develop
in their professional practice; 3.
Answering this questionnaire took the informants between 10 and 15
minutes approximately, the application was carried out at the BUAP facilities
with students who took the subject Human and Social Formation and Development
of Complex Thinking Skills, between January and February 2024. The results were
codified by designing a database where the answers given by the participating
subjects were located in order to proceed to their respective measurement,
using the Likert Scale, as well as the analysis of questions that required open
answers.
Results
From the measurement of the variables focused
on assessing the profile with which university students should be trained, it
was identified how they perceive the promotion of values and if they manage to
understand it as a reasonable alternative that leads to the transformation of
society by counteracting materialistic and individualistic principles. One of
the questions asked to the participating subjects corresponded to the attitudes
that teachers should demonstrate so that students promote a humanistic culture,
modifying the pragmatic postures with which they graduate and enter the labor
market as university-educated professionals.
If Table 4 is observed, according to the
results presented by the sample of students, the attitudes that they consider
that teachers should manifest in hierarchical order, in order to give meaning
to their teaching actions, through their example that will allow them to adopt
new ideological positions in the present are: 1. Maturity and respect in the
treatment of students - Administration
(92%); Civil Engineering (83%); Nursing (53%); History (93%)-
2. Ability to relate to other people -Administration (92%); Civil Engineering (83%); Nursing (53%); History (93%)- 3. Interest in students' academic performance -Administration (92%); Civil Engineering
(80%); Nursing (53%); History (80%)- 4. Trusting
environment they foster towards students -Administration
(70%); civil engineering (81%); Nursing (53%); History (85%).
Table 4.
Attitudes that teachers must show in order to
promote humanistic culture in students.
|
PROGRAM |
Public Administration |
Civil Engineering |
Nursing |
History |
|
A C T I T U R E S |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Maturity and
respect in the treatment of students. |
92 |
83 |
53 |
93 |
|
Ability to
relate to other people |
91 |
83 |
50 |
83 |
|
Interest in
student academic performance |
92 |
80 |
53 |
80 |
|
An environment
of trust that fosters trust towards students. |
70 |
81 |
53 |
85 |
|
Accessibility and
availability |
49 |
77 |
53 |
80 |
|
Appreciation of their
profession |
70 |
62 |
37 |
68 |
|
Ability and
confidence to teach |
49 |
61 |
50 |
90 |
|
Human competence |
60 |
77 |
0 |
0 |
|
Humility |
68 |
62 |
0 |
60 |
|
Concern for student learning |
49 |
64 |
53 |
78 |
|
Problem solving strategies |
55 |
62 |
37 |
78 |
|
Promotion of cultural values |
70 |
62 |
0 |
53 |
|
Sense of responsibility |
49 |
78 |
0 |
83 |
|
Teamwork |
53 |
78 |
45 |
65 |
Likewise, as an alternative to the humanistic
attitudes that students establish as essential, there are those where teachers
are requested to bet on accessibility, availability, responsibility, humility
with respect to their academic practice, demonstrating appreciation for their
profession, as well as teamwork and the promotion of strategies that ensure the
solution of problems by providing alternative answers for a world that has been
tinged by the Technological Revolution.
Another of the questions in the questionnaire
was that of the skills that university students should present and that will
allow them to participate in the global scenario. If Table 5 is observed, the
skills that university students should develop in the face of Globalization are
in the following order: 1. Efficiency -
Administration (98%); Civil Engineering (80%); Nursing (87%); History (60%)- 2. Quality -Administration
(96%); Civil Engineering (61%); Nursing (79%); History (25%)-
3. Productivity -Administration
(55%); Civil Engineering (77%); Nursing (82%); History (63%)-
4. Efficiency -
Administration (98%); Civil Engineering (83%); Nursing (74%); History (23%).
Based on the results, it is striking how students give priority to the skills
related to the discourses of the globalizing context, thinking that these are
the capacities, skills, aptitudes and qualities that a professional with a
university profile in the contemporary world must have.
Table 5.
Skills to be developed by the university student.
|
P R O G R A M M E |
Public Administration |
Civil Engineering |
Nursing |
History |
|
H A B I L I T I T I E S |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Efficiency |
98 |
80 |
87 |
60 |
|
Quality |
96 |
61 |
79 |
25 |
|
Productivity |
55 |
77 |
82 |
63 |
|
Efficiency |
98 |
83 |
74 |
23 |
|
Reasoning |
91 |
48 |
71 |
90 |
|
Creativity |
55 |
33 |
0 |
88 |
|
Application of knowledge |
70 |
45 |
74 |
85 |
|
Learning to solve |
70 |
61 |
84 |
85 |
|
Cognitive |
47 |
75 |
49 |
63 |
|
Ease of speech |
49 |
61 |
76 |
65 |
|
Management of work
techniques |
51 |
62 |
76 |
60 |
|
Motor |
70 |
75 |
79 |
65 |
|
Observation |
53 |
59 |
74 |
63 |
|
Critical thinking |
70 |
32 |
0 |
83 |
|
Logical thinking |
91 |
59 |
71 |
83 |
|
Promotion of self-knowledge |
57 |
48 |
71 |
68 |
|
Reflection |
53 |
31 |
0 |
63 |
In the case of Administration, the skills
considered basic by the students were, in hierarchical order: efficiency,
effectiveness, quality, logical thinking and reasoning; for Civil Engineering,
the following were presented: efficiency, effectiveness, productivity,
cognitive and motor skills. In the case of Nursing, efficiency, learning to
solve, productivity and quality prevailed. Finally, with History, the discipline
breaks with the structure of the previous programs because rather than
emphasizing pragmatic and utilitarian skills, it is inclined towards skills
that lead to the conformation of a humanistic labor participation such as:
reasoning, creativity, application of knowledge, learning to solve, logical and
critical thinking (see Table 6).
Table 6.
Skills considered basic by students
in hierarchical order.
|
H A B I L I T I T I E S |
Public Administration |
Civil Engineering |
Nursing |
History |
|
Application of knowledge |
|
|
|
3° |
|
Learning to solve |
|
|
2° |
|
|
Quality |
3° |
|
|
|
|
Creativity |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Efficiency |
2° |
2° |
|
|
|
Efficiency |
1° |
1° |
1° |
|
|
Productivity |
|
3° |
3° |
|
|
Reasoning |
|
|
|
1° |
With respect to the indicator: Attitudes that
the university student should develop in the international context, the
following were presented in hierarchical order: 1. Commitment - Administration (92%); Civil Engineering
(88%); Nursing (71%); History (85%); 2. Responsibility - Administration (89%); Civil Engineering
(81%); Nursing (71%); History (65%); 3. Being Positive -Administration (89%); Civil Engineering
(75%); Nursing (71%); History (83%)- 4. Sociability -Administration
(91%); Civil Engineering (71%); Nursing (82%); History (63%). The
data indicate that despite the fact that in contemporary skills, students
choose to promote those of a pragmatic and utilitarian nature, when analyzing
the attitudes with which they should perform, they do identify the importance
of having the essential values to implement in their professional work,
expressing the need to maintain and disseminate them as measures to ensure
progress and social development (see Table 7).
Table 7.
Attitudes to be promoted by the university student.
|
P R O G R A M M E |
Public Administration |
Civil Engineering |
Nursing |
History |
|
ATTITUDES |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Commitment |
92 |
88 |
71 |
85 |
|
Responsibility |
89 |
81 |
71 |
65 |
|
Being positive |
89 |
75 |
71 |
83 |
|
Sociability |
91 |
71 |
82 |
63 |
|
Ongoing training |
70 |
74 |
74 |
88 |
|
Cooperation |
58 |
45 |
0 |
85 |
|
Kindness |
28 |
52 |
84 |
68 |
|
Attention |
49 |
74 |
97 |
65 |
|
Kindness |
30 |
52 |
79 |
60 |
|
Good performance |
28 |
75 |
76 |
60 |
|
Professional interest |
70 |
55 |
74 |
65 |
|
Leadership |
32 |
52 |
71 |
55 |
|
Perfectionist |
28 |
52 |
74 |
28 |
|
Propositive |
49 |
52 |
71 |
83 |
|
Security |
49 |
52 |
87 |
60 |
|
Simplicity |
30 |
77 |
74 |
63 |
|
Seriousness |
32 |
46 |
71 |
60 |
|
Decision making |
60 |
45 |
79 |
65 |
|
Initiative |
49 |
45 |
0 |
85 |
|
Optimism |
70 |
45 |
0 |
63 |
|
Dedication |
64 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
From the characterization of attitudes
presented by the sample of subjects, and in order to understand their
positions, it was considered pertinent to visualize their concerns, thus in the
case of Administration the attitudes that are translated as the way of being of
the individuals and that the students consider as basic, were in hierarchical order:
commitment (92%), sociability (91%), responsibility (89%), and being positive
(89%); for Civil Engineering there were: commitment (88%), responsibility
(81%), simplicity (77%), and being positive (75%). In the case of Nursing the
following prevailed: attention (97%), safety (87%), kindness (84%), and being
positive (82%). Finally, the following were ranked with History: continuous
training (88%), commitment (85%), cooperation (85%) and initiative (85%), see
Table 8.
Table 8.
Attitudes considered basic
by students in hierarchical order.
|
ATTITUDES |
Public Administration |
Civil Engineering |
Nursing |
History |
|
Kindness |
|
|
3° |
|
|
Attention |
|
|
1° |
|
|
Commitment |
1° |
1° |
|
2° |
|
Cooperation |
|
|
|
3° |
|
Ongoing training |
|
|
|
1° |
|
Responsibility |
3° |
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
2° |
|
|
Simplicity |
|
3° |
|
|
|
Sociability |
2° |
2° |
|
|
Regarding the indicator: Values that the
university student should show, the following aspects were presented: 1.
Professional responsibility -Administration
(92%); Civil Engineering (75%); Nursing (74%); History (83%)-
2. Humility -Administration (91%);
Civil Engineering (45%); Nursing (79%); History (85%)-
3. Understanding -Administration
(28%); Civil Engineering (57%); Nursing (79%); History (80%)-
4. Honesty -Administration (89%);
Civil Engineering (69%); Nursing (74%); History (80%)-
5. Respect -Administration (34%);
Civil Engineering (71%); Nursing (84%); History (65%)-, see Table 9.
Table 9.
Proposal of values to be
promoted by the university student
|
P R O G R A M M E |
Public Administration |
Civil Engineering |
Nursing |
History |
|
V A L O R E S |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Professional Responsibility |
92 |
75 |
74 |
83 |
|
Humility |
91 |
45 |
79 |
85 |
|
Comprehension |
28 |
57 |
79 |
80 |
|
Honesty |
89 |
69 |
74 |
80 |
|
Respect |
34 |
71 |
84 |
65 |
|
Kindness |
28 |
48 |
76 |
60 |
|
Love for the profession |
26 |
62 |
71 |
65 |
|
Appreciation |
49 |
57 |
74 |
33 |
|
Interest |
51 |
77 |
68 |
38 |
|
Loyalty |
30 |
45 |
74 |
37 |
|
Moral |
53 |
46 |
76 |
60 |
|
Simplicity |
55 |
49 |
74 |
60 |
|
Sincerity |
57 |
45 |
74 |
80 |
|
Equality |
92 |
48 |
0 |
65 |
|
Tolerance |
94 |
46 |
0 |
65 |
The results indicate that students understand
that they must have technical skills for the workplace, and they know that in
order to achieve a favorable professional performance they must assume a series
of attitudes and values. The type of university professional profile that
should be formed at the university, according to the position of the students,
is the one that develops the skills presented by the educational discourse of
the globalizing context such as effectiveness, efficiency, productivity, and quality,
which should be harmonized with attitudes and values that lead to growth,
development and progress from attitudes that are represented by: commitment,
responsibility, being positive and sociable as a professional, and values such
as: honesty, humility, respect and tolerance, thus the University must
guarantee the formation of future professionals, through indispensable
knowledge that will allow them to exercise citizenship in an effective and
responsible manner which implies fostering those interpersonal, intercultural,
social and civic skills that allow students to understand our social reality,
coexist and exercise democratic citizenship in a pluralistic society (....)
beyond efficiency, effectiveness or competitiveness, it is important to adopt a
reflective stance on imported, ideologized and
apolitical proposals (López, 2014, p. 195).
Conclusions
The assessment of the
effects that the globalizing context has generated in HE allows visualizing its
influence on the professional training of undergraduate students, understanding
that there is a situation that leans more towards the action of individuality
instead of the collaboration that indicates the humanist attitude, as a result
of the trends and fashions that have been imposed by the deciding nations that
are still supported by the continuation of the capitalist system and the
neoliberal model, betting that societies respond to the demands of the
productive processes and the accumulation of surplus value as the economic
axis, thus causing the need to have cadres of workers from the category of
qualified workers to participate in the global phenomenon but that in
investment are conceived as cheap labor.
Faced with the
utilitarian outlook, the University must transform itself and assume a new
culture of professions and professional practice, establishing criteria with
which graduates will have to perform in the labor market. One of the important
aspects to highlight is the characterization of the profile of the person to be
formed in the classrooms, according to the development of skills that are
defined as the abilities, abilities, aptitudes and qualities that allow doing
something, as well as the attitudes that are conceived as the way or manner of
being together with the values, which are understood as everything that is
aspired to because it is considered desirable and, therefore, it is associated
to aspects such as appreciation, esteem, interest and preference.
The present study
indicates that 65% of the students accept the postulates of the globalizing
context in HE in their professional training, such as having specialized and
continuous education, with participation in stays abroad and language learning,
placing knowledge as an individual value and opportunity, but which also
generates the pressure to be hired as qualified labor, in the ideal of
professional -according to employers- which is based on the demonstration of
effectiveness, efficiency, quality and productivity. On the other hand, they
also point out the need to challenge the globalizing process by adding to their
future practice in the labor market social and cultural criteria that should be
activated from the promotion of values, as a conditioning factor of the
professional typology that conciliates and provides them with more opportunities
to be incorporated into social, productive and/or labor life. In the opinion of BUAP students, the values
with which they should perform in their professional practice are: that of
people who know how to respect, be responsible, commit themselves and work as a
team, being able to practice tolerance as an alternative for social
coexistence.
Globalization has
activated a series of effects, both positive and negative, which has influenced
the ideology of university students by orienting them towards the acceptance of
individuality, a consequence of the discourses of competitiveness, leaving aside
the humanistic vision, which must be recovered to achieve the means of
coexistence and respect for societies in the contemporary world, leading to the
integration of the multiple dimensions of human existence: social, ethical,
economic, cultural, civic and spiritual; the inclusion of people who are often
discriminated against (...) and taking into account their educational needs;
assuming learning in an open and flexible way to propitiate opportunities that
allow expressing the potential with a view to a sustainable future and a
dignified existence. In addition, it implies overcoming the vision of
conventional academic learning and accepting other forms of learning related to
the emotional, social and ethical (Ojalvo and Curiel, 2018, p. 119).
The analysis of the
influence of the international context of HE on
students shows that one of the problems is the lack of correspondence between
what students think and what the globalizing project manifests. There is a lack
of awareness of how to participate in the globalizing discourse because the
prevailing economic dynamics, technology and information saturation hinder
understanding and reflective analysis in the New World Order. It is difficult for students to identify the
skills and abilities they should develop and the attitudes and values they
should assume as professionals in their discipline, perhaps because they do not
observe in their own trainers the example of how to assume these principles
that give meaning to the existence of the profession, as well as the search for
the welfare of the individual and the collective.
Improvement alternatives
The alternatives that
favor the formation of professionals who abandon the world of materiality and
utility, so that humanization becomes the essential rule of action must opt
for: a) Making the teaching and promotion of values, as well as the
strengthening of ethics in professional practice for all areas of knowledge, be
established as a foundation for all areas of knowledge within the University.
b) Design academic programs based on the objectives, contents and learning
activities of a given discipline to generate a human, reflective and proactive
vision, instead of a dehumanized, material and conformist posture. c) Encourage
university professors to assume attitudes that open the humanistic culture, so
that through their actions they show students how to break the pragmatic
postures with which they are formed and graduate to enter the labor market.
Final considerations
Globalization has
transformed higher education, because by imposing the preferential economic
view on the humanistic vision, derived from the
requirements of the labor market and the need to have professionals who
demonstrate high standards of labor skills have pushed aside the performance
values relevant to life in society. University education, under the influence
of accreditation and certification processes, has focused on quality and
productivity rather than on critical reflection or the integral development of
the person. In view of this reality, it is imperative to reorient HE towards a humanistic approach that strengthens the
teaching of values.
The assimilation of a
humanistic attitude in university students allows to delimit
the promotion of values, as a response that leads to the advancement and
strengthening of society. The subjects that are educated in universities, and
in the case of BUAP students, must start by placing as a central point the
development of social and cultural life, the desire to improve, respect for
others, which must be on a par with the technical and human training.
Emphasizing the humanistic aspect as a daily practice and being responsible
with the way of thinking, is what will allow students and future graduates to
interact permanently with others; solving, developing the ability to "know
how to do"; and most importantly, retake and reaffirm traditional values.
It is important that
undergraduate students reflect on the importance of the humanistic vision
"as a selective process for the establishment of more supportive
relationships, with dialogic transformations and collaborative methods, through
the collective exercise among peers in their formative plane" (Sesento, 2021, p. 70). 70), being a fundamental need for
all disciplines, that is, both those that bet on exact and technological
knowledge, as well as the humanities themselves, otherwise the progress of our
world will be doomed to failure, because even if we have advanced technology
and scientific progress, the absence of fundamental values in humanity will
prevent individuals from realizing themselves fully, ending up affecting the
world in general and society itself in particular.
Reference
Berumen, N. (2001). Ética del ejercicio profesional.
Mexico: Patria Cultural.
BUAP (2024). Anuario estadístico institucional
2023-2024. Puebla: Rectoría BUAP.
Calzada, T. (1998). Engagement and complexity.
Childhood and
Learning, 82 (1). 75-77.
Camps, V. (1993). Los valores de la educación. Madrid:
Alauda.
Coll, C. (1998). Predicate values, practiced
values, taught values. Journal
for the study of education and development, 21 (82), 63-64.
Dimas, T. (2017). Ethics, Higher
Education, pedagogical practices of professional training. Pedagogy and Society, 20 (50), 239-257.
García, N. (2009). La globalización imaginada. Madrid:
Paidós.
Garza, J. (2000). Educación en Valores. Mexico:
Trillas-ITESM.
López, R. (2014). Professional
training in higher education. Curricular projects
and practices. CPU-e,
Revista de Investigación Educativa, 18 (1), 191-196.
McMillan, J. and
Schumacher, S. (2005). Educational
research. Madrid: Pearson Educación, S.
A.
Ojalvo, V. and Curiel, L.
(2018). The humanistic tradition
of Cuban education: premise for teacher training in socioaffective
education. Atenas, 3 (43),
118-125.
SELA (2024). Work
Program 2022-2026. 50th Regular Meeting of the Latin
American Council. Caracas:
Permanent Secretariat of SELA.
Sesento, L. (2021). Humanistic
training in higher education. Tutoring programs in
universities. Innovaciones Educativas, 23
(34), 70-80.
Torres, A. and Zanatta, M. (2022). Citizenship training in higher
level education in the Latin American context, 2011-2020. Andean Journal of Education, 6 (1),
1-10.
Vargas, J. (2010). From
humanistic training to integral training: reflections on the displacement of
the meaning and purposes of Higher Education. Praxis
Filosófica, 30 (1), 145-167.
Washburn, S., Chaves, L.,
Valverde, M. and Páez,
W. (2022). Values
and human rights education in teacher education at the University of Costa Rica.
Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 22 (2), 1-34.